Australia Day for mourning, not rejoicing

January 29, 2011
Issue 
Sam Watson.

The Australian Museum hosted a debate on January 23 on the topic: “Is the 26th of January the most appropriate date to celebrate our national identity?”

Sixty people attended the debate, which pitted historian and educator Nigel Parbury against Brisbane indigenous leader and Socialist Alliance member Sam Watson.

Parbury put the affirmative case and said that Australia Day had changed over the decades to better reflect the country's multicultural community. But he conceded that much more change was needed in future.

Watson argued Australia Day should be abandoned. “January 26 is a monumental fraud, a lie and a travesty,” he said. “The land of Australia was never purchased, nor was a treaty ever made between the British colonial power and the Aboriginal nations.

“Now, 223 years after the original landing, Aboriginal people will again rally on Invasion Day to face the same challenge of the unfinished business flowing from that legacy of colonial dispossession and racial discrimination.”

He said the area of Sydney near the museum was “very significant to us Aboriginal people, because it was here that a rally was organised by Indigenous elders on January 26, 1938, to mark the 150th anniversary of the landing of Captain Cook that day in 1788.

“The organisers issued an important statement, which said in part: ‘This is not a day of rejoicing, but a day of mourning' for Aboriginal Australians.

"We should suspend January 26 as Australia Day until a treaty is signed with Aboriginal people; until an unqualified apology is issued for our dispossession; until a Truth and Reconciliation Commission is established (as in post-Apartheid South Africa); until full reparations are paid to Aboriginal people; and until a new name is given to the country, with a new flag and a new national identity."

Comments

That's an outrageously biased account of an interesting debate. I did say Australia Day has changed over the years and better reflects who we are now, but it was not just about being multicultural. I also said that on 26 January people across the country - 'black' and 'white' - also celebrate Survival Day, Invasion Day, Yabun and a range of other Aboriginal events, that remind everyone that 26 January is not just a day of celebration. Yes, I conceded that much has to be done to make this country the best we can be, but I also said that much has been achieved. And I also asked the audience to think about the nature of our 'Aussie' identity, and where it really comes from. I said quite clearly that I reckon Aboriginality is the 'X-factor' of Aussie!Aussie!Aussie! My other main argument - which you haven't bothered to report at all - was, how long do we think it would take to agree on an appropriate date?? About 100 years?? Of course, as I said, 26 January is not the best date to celebrate our unique national identity, but the day, and Australia, have changed - surely it is better to change the day than waste our lives trying to change the date. - Nigel Parbury

You need 鶹ý, and we need you!

鶹ý is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.