Union warns of ā€˜devastatingā€™ Coalition cuts to public service

April 17, 2025
Issue 
The Liberal-aligned Menzies Research Centre wants the Coalition to go harder on public sector job cuts. The allegation, as its front cover shows, is that public servants make people's lives harder.

The Community and Public Sector Union (CPSU) has warned that opposition leader Peter Duttonā€™s revised plan to cut public services if he wins on May 3 would have a ā€œdevastating and uneven impact across the public sectorā€.

Dutton said on April 7 he will cut the public sector 3.5 times more than former Liberal Prime Minister Tony Abbott did back in 2013.

After being criticised for promising to cut 36,000 Australian Public Service (APS) jobs, the Coalition then said it would shrink the public service by 41,000 jobs within five years by ā€œnatural attritionā€ ā€” allegedly without retrenchments or cuts to frontline services.

ā€œA freeze on filling public service roles for five years is likely to exceed the 41,000 already on the chopping block,ā€ theĀ  on April 7. It added that this was a ā€œrecklessā€ decision which would hollow out essential services and leave millions worse off.

The CPSU said that, based on agency attrition rates,Ā Services Australia would lose 12,500 jobs (42% of staff over 5 years); the Department of Veterans Affairs would lose almost 1000 jobs (27% of staff over 5 years); the National Disability Insurance Authority (NDIA) would lose 2070 jobs (21% over 5 years).

The AustralianĀ Public ServiceĀ Commission (APSC) figures show 11,782 staff left the federal public service last year: 6665 (57%) came from the home affairs and defence departments, the Australian Taxation Office and ServicesĀ Australia.

CPSU national secretaryĀ Melissa Donnelly said:Ā ā€œCutting public services by attrition ā€¦ are uncontrolled, uneven cuts that will hurt the public sector and have a disproportionate impact on frontline services.ā€

Donnelly said cutting public services by attrition and implementing a hiring freeze ā€œcould lead to public sector cuts that are significantly higher than 41,000ā€.

Liberal Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price has been given the job to lead Australiaā€™s version of the United States Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) should the Coalition win.

One new detail, Price revealed recently, is that Australiaā€™s DOGE would be within the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C) and investigate where cuts could be made in the wider public service.

Price is a Trump supporter, telling a media conference with Dutton recently that the Coalition wants to ā€œmake Australia great againā€.

Meanwhile, a new report by the Liberal-aligned think tank, the Menzies Research Centre, is urging the on public sector cuts, including auditing the more than 200,000 federal workforce ā€œto determine the efficient level of resourcing required to deliverĀ servicesĀ and programs of similar scale and complexityā€.

The Stop the Bloat reportĀ claims that there is ā€œconsiderable supportā€ from the public to ā€œlower costsā€ and cites the Trump administration and British Labourā€™s Keir Starmer as drivers of ā€œefficiencyā€ and ā€œinnovationā€.

It calls for a minimum six-month hiring freeze, with limited exemptions for graduate programs and special cases, but with the Department of Defence to be made immune. Natural attrition in the workforce would continue, it said, with some 5500 people expected to exit theĀ public serviceĀ in that period.

Socialist Alliance NSW Senate candidate Peter Boyle told Ā鶹“«Ć½ that whatever the Coalitionā€™s final public service cut figures it is clear that a Peter Dutton-led government would be a ā€œdisaster for the public sector and services as a wholeā€.

ā€œWe need a radical expansion of the public sector, including social welfare, public housing, health and education, and protection of the natural environment,ā€ Boyle said. ā€œOnly with such a plan can we make the necessary plan for the urgent transition to a job rich, sustainable public energy plan, with a well educated community.

ā€œA vote for Socialist Alliance is a clear vote in favor of the public sector in all its forms,ā€ Boyle added. ā€œAllocating our preferences to the Greens and Labor before the Liberals can ensure the anti-public sector fanatics are rejected on May 3.ā€

You need Ā鶹“«Ć½, and we need you!

Ā鶹“«Ć½ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.