
Farmers for Climate Action hosted aĀ Zoom meetingĀ on December 1 to discuss the implicationsĀ of the federal governmentāsĀ gas-led economic recovery. ParticipantsĀ joinedĀ from all over regional eastern Australia, asĀ well as Melbourne and Sydney.
Richard Heath from the Australian Farm InstituteĀ noted that theĀ push was aĀ huge risk to agriculture and was incompatible withĀ slowingĀ climate change. HeathĀ saidĀ two jobs are lost in agriculture for every job in the gas industry,Ā meaningĀ there is a net negative benefit where gas exploration is allowed.
The social impactĀ on communitiesĀ isĀ also bad on farmersāĀ mental health:Ā communities fragmentĀ asĀ agricultural workers move awayĀ when industrial scale gas extraction sets up. This leads to schools, shops, banks and football teams closing down.
The power imbalanceĀ betweenĀ individual farmers and the large corporations they are trying to deal with exacerbates the problem and makes it important forĀ farmersĀ toĀ understand their rights.
Compared to other businesses, the economic risks of inaction on climate change for farmers is high: drought, excessive heat, erratic rainfall, high costs and uncertain sales all mount up.
āThere is a need to reduceĀ farmersāĀ risks, not to increase itā, said Heath.Ā āIt is clear we have alternatives to gas for energy needs. The impact on the water supply to farms could be catastrophic if gas exploration goes ahead.
āThe construction ofĀ gas pipelinesĀ alsoĀ damagesĀ theĀ farmāsĀ infrastructure, which is not taken into account.Ā The loss of water assets is of most concern because of its potential contamination.ā
Health added that theĀ gas corporationsāĀ modelling of the impact on groundwater and the aquifers is so badly done that the impact is virtually unknown. Further, insurance companies will not insure farmers for any damage to their farms caused by gas exploration,Ā putting farmersĀ in a vulnerable situation.
Niall Blair from Charles Sturt UniversityĀ inĀ New South WalesĀ said that, asĀ mostĀ industries areĀ embracingĀ renewable energy, even beer companies, it is now a very viable alternativeĀ source of energy.Ā He said that farmers are not againstĀ renewable energy and pointed toĀ the iconic windmillĀ asĀ evidence.
Blair talked about moving from a linearĀ toĀ a circular economy where food waste, water overuse, packaging and emissions are addressed.Ā He said plastics need to beĀ recycledĀ andĀ supply chainsĀ need to be madeĀ more sustainable. The technology is reliable and, in the future, industries will be powered using batteriesĀ for storage.
He said gas explorationĀ threatens toĀ polluteĀ theĀ underground water supply, possibly forever.Ā He criticised the situation where gasĀ corporations are able toĀ negotiate dealsĀ with individual farmersĀ in a non-transparent way.
Blair said confusion over theĀ federal governmentāsĀ energy policy hadĀ led to a lack of investment in renewable energy infrastructure.
[Click for more information about Farmers for Climate Action.]