Vaccine nationalism and the Global South

January 6, 2021
Issue 
Nearly 70 poor countries will only be able to vaccinate one in ten people against COVID-19 in 2021 due to vaccine apartheid.

United Nations Secretary-General Ant贸nio Guterres on January 3: 鈥淰accine nationalism is not only unfair, it is self-defeating. No country will be safe 鈥 until all countries are safe.鈥

Guterres鈥 words serve as a reminder to wealthy nations of their responsibility in creating 鈥済lobal vaccine apartheid鈥 鈥斅爐he unequal distribution of COVID-19 vaccines on economic lines.

Global vaccine apartheid

Wealthy nations, such as the United States, Britain, Japan and the European Union, spent billions of dollars on deals with vaccine developers such as Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca, even before their efficacy was proven. Rich nations representing just 14% of the world鈥檚 population have 53% of all the most promising vaccines so far.

Australia, Canada聽and Japan have less than 1% of the world's coronavirus cases. Still, they have more doses of vaccines than all of Latin America and the Caribbean 鈥斅燼 region with more than 17% of global coronavirus cases.

Canada has signed deals to up to 414 million doses of various vaccines 鈥斅爑p to five times more than its population requires. The US and Germany have contracted for enough doses of various COVID-19 vaccines to inoculate their populations .

In the US, many vaccines are set to even before being distributed.

More than 12 million doses of vaccines have been distributed so far in 33 countries, but are in Africa.

South Africa, the most badly hit country on the African continent, has been unable to procure vaccine from Moderna. The country鈥檚 government says it was to persuade the company to submit its vaccine to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority, the agency that approves vaccines.

While Moderna has refused to sell vaccines to South Africa, it has agreed to sell 40 million doses to Canada, 100 million doses to the United States聽and 160 million doses to the EU.

Such an instance of monopolisation by rich countries was replicated in the case of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Within days of its announcement, Pfizer more than 80% of the vaccine doses it will be able to produce by the end of the year聽to a handful of countries of the Global North.

Nearly 70 poor countries will only be able to 1 in 10 people against COVID-19 this year due to vaccine apartheid.

Most people in poor countries will be until 2024 for vaccinations if high-income countries (HICs) keep engaging in monopolistic practices. In a report by Northeastern University, in Boston, researchers this monopolisation of vaccines by wealthy nations could cause almost twice as many deaths as distributing them equally.

COVAX: an incomplete solution

The COVID-19 (COVAX) 鈥斅爈ed by the World Health Organization, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance 鈥斅爃as been established to prevent unequal vaccine distribution. It aims to accelerate COVID-19 vaccine development, secure doses for all countries聽and distribute those doses fairly, beginning with the highest-risk groups.

COVAX, funded through donations from HICs, is insufficient for ensuring timely and equitable access to COVID-19 products. COVAX aims to procure 2 billion doses of vaccine and share them equally between HICs and low and middle-income countries (LMICs).

However, the COVAX Facility has only 1 billion vaccine doses so far. By comparison, countries have 6 billion doses for themselves, through bilateral deals with pharmaceutical companies.

LICs, meanwhile, with a combined population of 1.7 billion people, have not yet signed a single bilateral vaccine deal.

COVAX has also been for negotiating prices that prioritise profit over the consideration of vaccines as a global public good, the lack of transparency of contracts entered into with vaccine manufacturers, limits on civil society participation and failure to address potential impacts of intellectual property rights on vaccines.

Challenging the Global North

In October, South Africa and India called for the World Trade Organization (WTO) to suspend intellectual property rights related to COVID-19 to ensure that not only the wealthiest countries will be able to access and afford the vaccines, medicines聽and other new technologies needed to control the pandemic.

The pharmaceutical industry and many HICs 鈥斅爐he US, Britain, EU, Canada, Switzerland, Norway, Australia, Brazil and Japan 鈥斅爒ehemently opposed the move.

The proposed waiver would cover patents, copyrights, trade secrets and industrial designs 鈥斅燼 measure that would allow poor countries to legally acquire and use proprietary technologies more easily than is possible under the current exceptions available for health emergencies under the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS).

The WTO proposal, Waiver from Certain Provisions of the TRIPS Agreement for the Prevention, Containment and Treatment of COVID-19 : 鈥淭here are several reports about intellectual property rights hindering or potentially hindering timely provisioning of affordable medical products to the patients 鈥 Beyond patents, other intellectual property rights may also pose a barrier, with limited options to overcome those barriers.鈥

Angered by a Global South plan that threatened to destabilise imperialist architectures, the core capitalist countries organised聽the criminal act of blocking a global, patent-free vaccine.

India clearly the predatoriness of these countries at the TRIPS Council Informal Meeting on November 20: 鈥淥n one hand, these countries are buying up as much of the limited supply as they can, leaving no vaccines in the pie for developing and least-developed countries. On the other hand, and very strangely, these are the same countries who are arguing against the need for the waiver that can help increase the global manufacturing and supply to achieve not just equitable, but also timely and affordable access to such vaccines for all countries.鈥

As rich countries scramble to hoard vaccines, the Global South needs to create institutional arrangements that would allow it to get life-saving medical technologies to their people at the lowest cost, without the fear of being sued for infringing intellectual property rights.

No one should be blocked from getting a life-saving vaccine just because they live in a country subject to the forces of imperialism. All countries of the Global South need to come together to challenge the exploitative dominance of the Global North and support an agenda for a people鈥檚 vaccine.

[Yanis Iqbal is a student and freelance writer based in Aligarh, India, and can be contacted at yanisiqbal@gmail.com.]

You need 麻豆传媒, and we need you!

麻豆传媒 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.