and health groups, including the Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists (AIOH),聽are calling a total ban on the construction industry using engineered stone bench tops which contain silica.
Building workers in Sydney marched on April 5 to demand an end to the 鈥渒iller stone鈥.
Products with high聽silica聽levels 鈥 commonly used in kitchen and bathroom benches 鈥 have been linked to the deadly silicosis lung disease and cancer.
Silicosis can be contracted by inhaling crystalline聽silica聽dust聽while cutting, grinding or drilling the engineered stone.
(ACTU) and the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) want a licensing scheme for the handling, or removal, of all existing bench tops. The聽CFMEU wants trades people dealing with the manufactured stone to be listed on a national register and screened for silicosis.
The ACTU said in its submission to Safe Work Australia鈥檚 inquiry into the proposed ban, that engineered stone bench tops were a 鈥渇ashion item,鈥 not an essential building material.
鈥淲ith alternatives readily available, why are we risking the lives of tradies for a fashionable finish in our kitchens?鈥 ACTU assistant secretary Liam O鈥橞rien told the April 20 Sydney Morning Herald.
that a quarter of stonemasons who work with engineered stone products had contracted silicosis. Further, modeling showed that more than 100,000 workers will be diagnosed with silicosis in coming decades, with a significant proportion coming from the engineered stone industry; a further 10,000 workers will be diagnosed with other cancers.
The unions want a full ban until independent, peer reviewed research could determine what, in any, exposure level was safe for stonemasons and other trades people.
Federal health minister Mark Butler said in February聽the Labor government had only decided to monitor the聽silica聽mitigation strategy.
鈥淲e don鈥檛 need further monitoring, we need decisive action now,鈥 CFMEU national secretary Zach Smith said.
If the government failed to ban the bench tops by mid-2024, unions would be forced to 鈥渢ake matters into our own hands on site鈥, Smith said.
鈥淲e鈥檝e set a deadline. Either the minister steps up and fixes this by mid-2024, or our members will just refuse to touch these bench tops on construction sites across Australia.鈥
Some companies would attempt to water down regulations, Smith said, but he urged the government to hold firm. 鈥淭hese companies have been allowed to squeeze profits from the blood of Australian workers for decades. They must not be given another inch now,鈥 he said.
鈥淭he government has no reason to delay,鈥 Smith said.
鈥淵ou have a long list of public health organisations calling for a ban; you have unions calling for a ban; you have silicosis sufferers calling for a ban. And now you even have a key manufacturer calling for a ban. It鈥檚 time to act now.鈥
The Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry opposes a blanket ban on engineered stone, as well as a licensing scheme for suppliers, arguing that all products have some level of risk.
But the AIOH said it is not possible to determine a safe amount of crystalline聽silica.
Professor Dino Pisaniello from the University of Adelaide鈥檚 School of Public Health said there was 鈥渘o definitive scientific evidence鈥 that health risks decreased with lower crystalline聽silica聽content.
鈥淒ust particles less than one micrometre in size, whether from high or low聽silica聽materials, appear to generate the most inflammation in the lung, and are also the hardest to control in the workplace,鈥 she said.