
New South Wales Premier Gladys Berejiklian is facing increasing pressure, externally and internally, over her links to alleged corruption and her brazen normalisation of pork-barrelling.
An Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) inquiry has been looking into whether she was aware of alleged corruption by close associate and former Liberal MP Daryl McGuire.
A Legislative Council inquiry is still trying to uncover the process by which her office made decisions to allocate at least $100 million from a $250 million council grant scheme to Coalition dominated councils ahead of the 2019 election.
Berejeklian鈥檚 admission in late November that pork barrelling is 鈥渘ot an illegal practice鈥 and that all governments routinely 鈥渕ake commitments to the community in order to curry favour鈥 shows she is fighting back.
But will she be successful? It appears that some Liberal Party MPs are conducting a head count in case.
She was attempting to defend her office鈥檚 direct involvement in the allocation of more than $100 million from a $250 million Stronger Communities Fund to fund projects in Coalition聽seats ahead of the 2019 state election.
This was only confirmed聽after documents she ordered to be shredded were recovered through a forensic investigation of computer records.
NSW Greens , who is leading a Legislative Council inquiry into how the grants were approved, said Berejiklian鈥檚 order to shed the approval emails showed she was directly involved.
鈥淎ll the Office of Local Government got to 鈥榮ign off on鈥 from the Deputy Premier鈥檚 office was a dollar amount and a project name 鈥 there was no comprehensive assessment provided,鈥 Shoebridge tweeted on December 9, as the hearing resumed.
Futher, he said, the 鈥渇unding approval that we are told is the approval for the Wagga grants was signed about 5 months after the Premier announced the projects!鈥
The 鈥 a $5.5 million grant for the Australian Clay Target Association鈥檚 clubhouse and convention centre 鈥 is connected to the聽disgraced聽Maguire whose dodgy 鈥渂usiness鈥 dealings led Berejiklian to stand him down in 2018.
鈥淲e鈥檝e had the premier all year ducking and weaving, trying to deny her role in approving these projects,鈥 Shoebridge said. 鈥淲e now have it in black and white that the premier was approving project after project after project.鈥
NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay said on December聽8 that the premier had shown her 鈥渞eal priorities鈥 by not giving 鈥渁 single thought to allocating $250 million in grants on the basis of need鈥.
Bernard Keane, writing in Crikey on November 27, asked why, if Berejeklian was relaxed about using taxpayer funds for political purposes would she care that Maguire was also misusing taxpayer funds.
鈥淭he premier plainly thinks she is untouchable; that the absence of any widely-accepted successor and her popularity over the handling of the pandemic 鈥斅Ruby Princess聽tragedy notwithstanding 鈥 means she can act with impunity, even if it means admitting to voters she uses their money to suit her own political agenda, not for the betterment of NSW.鈥
Referring perhaps to NSW Labor鈥檚 time in government, he said the 鈥渂ad old days of NSW are back, after barely being gone for five minutes鈥.
Jamie Parker, NSW Greens spokesperson on anti-corruption matters,聽criticised the government鈥檚 funding cuts to ICAC. 鈥淭he funding of independent agencies shouldn鈥檛 be controlled by the very politicians they are supposed to police,鈥 he said on November聽10.
鈥淭he premier says she isn鈥檛 holding funding back, but in the last 12 years ... ICAC has applied for increases in recurrent funding seven times and only been fully successful twice.
鈥淭his is another example of this government鈥檚 woeful track record implementing anti-corruption reforms. In early 2018 they committed to increase protections for whistle-blowers who disclose to the ICAC, but two long years later there has been no action.
鈥淭he only people who benefit from a weak ICAC are corrupt politicians and public officials who seek to use public office for their own personal profit,鈥 Parker said.