Socialist Alliance condemns Australiaā€™s abstention on UN motion to end to Zionist occupation of Palestine

September 24, 2024
Issue 
An overwhelming majority of United Nations member countries supported a resolution calling for an end to Israelā€™s occupation of Palestinian territory. Photo: United Nations

By abstaining on the latest United Nations General AssemblyĀ Ā against Israelā€™s occupation of Palestine, the Australian government has failed Palestinian people, international law and to support peace and justice in the world, Socialist Alliance national co-convenor Sam Wainwright toldĀ Ā鶹“«Ć½.

The resolution, adopted on September 18 by an overwhelming majority, demanded that Israel completely end its unlawful presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) withinĀ a year.

One-hundred-and-twenty-four nations voted in favour, with 14 against and 43 abstentions.

The resolution called upon all member states to refrain from recognising Israelā€™s presence in the OPT as lawful and ensure they do not provide aid or assistance to maintaining the situation created by the occupation.

This includes taking measures to prevent the citizens, companies and entities under their jurisdiction from engaging in activities that support or sustain Israelā€™s occupation.

The resolution also called on nations to stop importing products from Israeli settlements and to halt the transfer of arms, munitions and related equipment to Israel where there are reasonable grounds to suspect they may be used in the OPT.

It also called for sanctions, such as travel bans and asset freezes, against individuals and entities involved in maintaining Israelā€™s unlawful presence in the OPT and ensuring that those engaged in these activities (including settlers) face legal and financial consequences.

ā€œThere wonā€™t be any steps towards justice in the Middle East unless there is pressure put on Israel,ā€ Wainwright said. ā€œAustraliaā€™s refusal to support the latest UN resolution, which simply support the findings of the International Court of Justice [ICJ] means, in practice, it is supporting Israel continuing to do what it is doing.

ā€œThe fundamental position of the Australian government is to support Israel. An example of that is the $917 million deal with Elbit Systems ā€¦ only weeks after the ICJ found that there was a plausible case of genocide against Israel.

ā€œEvery state in the world has an obligation to stop that [genocide].ā€

Wainwright said Australiaā€™s position ā€œis partly the fruit of the AUKUS deal which has bound it more tightly to the USā€.

ā€œIt was heartening that a number of Western countries voted for the UN resolution.

ā€œNot just Ireland, which you would expect, but also Norway, Finland, Belgium, France, Spain, Portugal, Iceland and, in our region, New Zealand and Japan.

ā€œSo it wasnā€™t only the Global South that voted in favour.

ā€œThe public pressure against Israelā€™s horrendous genocide ā€¦ means that Israel is more isolated than ever.

ā€œBut Australia, Canada, Britain and the US are still not prepared to put any pressure on Israel to stop its genocide in Gaza.

ā€œThe Australian government has failed the Palestinian people, failed international law and failed [to support] peace and justice in the world at this critical point,ā€ Wainwright said.

You need Ā鶹“«Ć½, and we need you!

Ā鶹“«Ć½ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.