Released cabinet papers on Iraq war support still not transparent

January 4, 2024
Issue 
Australian (left) and US military protecting Iraq鈥檚 Khawr Al Amaya and Al Basra oil terminals, November 2006. Photo: Lt Karen E Eifert/Wikimedia

The release of cabinet documents from 2003 under the John Howard government has failed to clarify exactly how it decided to send Australian troops to the Iraq War.

This crucial decision remains largely hidden from Australians, partly due to a聽聽by the Scott Morrison Coalition government to withhold some of the documents.

Australians for War Powers Reform () is calling for those 鈥渕issing鈥 documents to be released immediately.

鈥淚t is unacceptable that the Australian public is still being kept in the dark after two decades,鈥 said聽Dr Alison聽Broinowski AM聽from the AWPR.

鈥淭he Iraq war was a disaster from start to finish. Hundreds of thousands of civilians were killed and no weapons of mass destruction were ever found.

鈥淗oward鈥檚 decision to take us to that conflict was opposed by a large majority of Australians, the Labor Opposition and the minor parties, yet he went ahead with his plan.鈥

Broinowski said it was聽because MPs were then and are still not permitted to vote on the question of going to war in the House of Representatives.

In the Senate in 2003, a majority opposed it (37 to 32).

The invasion breached international law and contributed to a rise in terrorism聽in many countries.

From the material that was released on January 1, we know that Howard鈥檚 decision was made without transparency or accountability.

The decision to commit troops was made聽聽on the costs, benefits and implications of the deployment.

鈥淚t is absurd that this life-and-death decision was made without any proper scrutiny or evaluation and presented to the Cabinet as a fait accompli,鈥 Broinowski said.

鈥淪ending our troops into a dangerous mission without a serious discussion of the all the possible implications is a dereliction of duty by the government.

鈥淚t is now clear that the only people involved in the decision were a small number of ministers on the national security committee. Most of the cabinet had no effective input: no ordinary government MPs were given a say and the whole Parliament was prevented from voting on the deployment.鈥

Twenty years on, we have learnt very little from the Iraq catastrophe. Unlike in Britian, where a lengthy聽聽was held into the country鈥檚 involvement in the war on Iraq, no such investigation has been offered here.

鈥淲e need to end Howard鈥檚 鈥榗aptain鈥檚 call鈥 decision-making process and implement聽,鈥 Broinowski said.

鈥淭he whole parliament should carefully debate and vote before Australia commits to any future overseas wars. This is the only way to ensure genuine transparency and accountability.鈥

[Mark Robinson聽is a member of Australians for War Powers Reform.]

You need 麻豆传媒, and we need you!

麻豆传媒 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.