Francesca Albaneseā€™s second report on Gaza: ā€˜Genocide as colonial erasureā€™

November 11, 2024
Issue 
United Nations Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese. Photo: National Press Club

United Nations Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese suggested in her new report on October 31,Ā , that Israelā€™s genocidal violence on Palestinians in the Gaza Strip is integral to the Zionist regimeā€™s goal of colonising Palestine.

This is the Italian lawyerā€™s second report on Gaza. Her , released inĀ March, found there were reasonable grounds to believe that Israelā€™s actions in Gaza had met thresholds indicating it is committing genocide.

The new report includes Israelā€™s violence in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem.

Albanese is known as the ā€œgood Albaneseā€, after putting Australiaā€™sĀ media in its place at the .

She said while ā€œthe scale and nature of the ongoing Israeli assaultā€ varies in different areas, the totality of ā€œthe Israeli acts of destruction directed against the totality of the Palestinian peopleā€ warrant the application of the Genocide Convention (the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide).

Albanese assesses the Israeli-made catastrophe in Gaza through the lens of theĀ , the Apartheid Convention, international humanitarian, human rights and criminal and customary law.

It is also informed by the International Court of Justiceā€™s (ICJ) finding in July that theĀ .

The UN special rapporteur concludes that nation states that are party to the Genocide Convention have a legal obligation to prevent ā€œthe serious risk of its continuous breachā€.

Destruction laid bare

Albanese said that, as she was writing, Gazaā€™s official death toll surpassed 42,000 people, although the true figure is likely thousands more. This included more than 13,000 kids and more than 700 babies, with ā€œmany shot in the head and chestā€.

Distribution sites, tents, hospitals, schools and markets have all been attacked. ā€œThe magnitude of destruction in Gaza has prompted allegations of domicide, urbicide, scholasticide, medicide, cultural genocide and ecocide,ā€ Albanese wrote. ā€œNearly 40 million tons of debris, including unexploded ordnance and human remains, contaminate the ecosystem.ā€

ā€œMore than 140 temporary waste sites and 340,000 tons of waste, untreated wastewater and sewage overflow contribute to the spread of diseases such as hepatitis A, respiratory infections, diarrhea and skin diseases,ā€ she said. ā€œAs Israeli leaders promised, Gaza has been made unfit for human life.ā€

Her report further confirms that Israel has built roads and bases in more than 26% of the Gaza Strip. The ā€œbuffer zoneā€, along the Gaza border with Israel, has been extended to 16% of the territory, while 84% of the Gaza Strip has been forcibly evacuated ā€” the majority of the population corralled into a ā€œhumanitarian zoneā€ of just 12.6%.

The list of atrocities is never ceasing: 32 of 36 hospitals had been damaged within 300 days, purposeful attacks on food supplies, to trigger starvation, have been described by an Israeli minister as ā€œjustified and moralā€.

Polio has reemerged in Gaza, and Israel has attacked polio vaccination operations.

She said this ā€œwholesale destructionā€ is ā€œnow metastasising to the West Bank, including East Jerusalemā€. This includes 5505 Israeli forces raids between October 2023 and September.

Offence of genocide

ā€œEven when conservatively considered, these multiple torments constitute precisely the irreparable harm that ICJ has warned against since January 2024, and which Israel has intentionally inflicted on the Palestinians as a group,ā€ Albanese said.

The ICJĀ Ā and ordered it to stop genocidal acts immediately.

The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide as ā€œacts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious groupā€. There are five categories of what comprise genocidal acts: killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm, bringing about destructive conditions of life, preventing births and forcibly transferring children of the group.

Article 1 of the Genocide Convention provides that state parties, of which Australia has been since 1949, are required to actively prevent and punish a genocide taking place, whether it be perpetrated in a ā€œtime of peace or a time of warā€.Ā Ā can be seen as being in line with this obligation.

Albanese outlines that the prevention and punishment and, ā€œin particular, proving genocidal intentā€ is still developing.

She said that ā€œstigmaā€ attached to genocide prevents perpetrators from documenting its commission and, therefore, to establish intent, ā€œa complex assessment of facts, statements and circumstancesā€ must be undertaken.

She further asserted that to prove genocidal intent the totality of the multiple atrocities being perpetrated with intent to destroy must be assessed, as genocide is ā€œmore structurally complex and insidiousā€ than other atrocity crimes, such as mass killing or extermination.

The historical and sociopolitical context in which genocide forms is ā€œkey to identifying how intent formsā€.

ā€œIn settler colonial contexts, land and its resources are particularly relevant,ā€ the special rapporteur underscores. ā€œLand is intrinsic to both a peopleā€™s right to self-determination and the settler colonial project. An inherent conflict exists between the colonisers, who seek to acquire and control the land, and the Indigenous population, for whom the land is integral to their identity.ā€

Genocidal intent is not confined to individual perpetrators, as it has been established in international criminal tribunals that it can be a state responsibility ā€œwithout an individual being convicted of the crimeā€.

This can be established via an assessment of the aggregate genocidal intent of individual perpetrators. A state should not be exonerated from the charge of genocide, according to Albanese, and genocidal intent can be established via ā€œthe only reasonable inferenceā€ test.

Genocide under Australian law

°Õ³ó±šĢż, which came into effect on July 1, 2002, established the International Criminal Court (ICC) as well as core internationalĀ : genocide; crimes against humanity; and war crimes; as well as crimes of aggression, added in 2010.

Federal in June 2002 to enact three international atrocity crimes, as part of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (division 268).

The various forms of the core internationalĀ Ā are set out under Sections 268.3 through to 268.7.

These carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Yet, to launch a genocide prosecution, the federal attorney general must first approve it and this has never happened.

Independent Senator Lidia Thorpeā€™s is seeking to remove the attorney generalā€™s fiat from the atrocity crimes, so they can no longer be blocked.

The totality reveals the crime

ā€œThe current intent to destroy the people as such could not be more evident from Israeli conduct when viewed in its totality,ā€ Albaneseā€™s report said, and it adds three factors that support this.

The first is Israelā€™s long-term ambition to secure a ā€œgreater Israelā€ encompassing all Palestinian territory. Gaza has been ā€œintentionally rendered unlivableā€ since last October to destroy the Palestinian people and this is now spreading to the West Bank. Her third point is that the genocide has been facilitated by the broad assertion that Israel is ā€œdefendingā€ itself.

Further criminal responsibility for a genocide cannot be confined to individual actors, as it must capture the responsibility of the state, she writes.

ā€œA state is obliged to prevent, to not commit and to punish genocideā€. Since the ICJ plausible genocide ruling in January, it has been incumbent upon the Israeli government to stop the genocide, which it has not attempted to do.

ā€œInstead, genocidal violence continued in Gaza with serious risk of expanding to the West Bank amid increasing genocidal incitement,ā€ Albanese writes. ā€œNo one has been investigated or prosecuted, let alone punished.ā€

Albanese said Israelā€™s genocide is part of the century-old Israeli settler colonial project.

To halt Israeli crimes she recommends ā€œfull arms embargos and sanctionsā€, recognising Israel as an apartheid state, deployment of international protectors, protections for displaced Gazans, prosecution of dual citizens involved and ensuring that humanitarian aid is unhindered.

ā€œSince its establishment, Israel has treated the occupied people as a hated encumbrance and threat to be eradicated, subjecting millions of Palestinians, for generations, to everyday indignities, mass killing, mass incarceration, forced displacement, racial segregation and apartheid,ā€ Albanese said.

ā€œAs the world watches the first livestreamed settler colonial genocide, only justice can heal the wounds that political expedience has allowed to fester. The devastation of so many lives is an outrage to humanity and all that international law stands for.ā€

[Paul Gregoire writes for Sydney Criminal Lawyers, where this article was .]

You need Ā鶹“«Ć½, and we need you!

Ā鶹“«Ć½ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.