French president Emmanuel Macron has named a Prime Minister from the right-wing party that came fourth in June鈥檚 elections.
Just like Donald Trump, Macron has little respect for democracy. After the victory of the left against the right and against the fascists in June, and faced with a parliament where the left alliance, the New Popular Front (NFP), won the biggest grouping of MPs at the elections, he has appointed a PM from the losing side! This is because the left had promised to reverse his attacks on pensions, and raise the minimum wage, among many other things.
After eight weeks of refusing to name a PM, Macron has chosen 73-year-old, right-wing hack, Michel Barnier. His age is no real surprise. The job is a bit of a poisoned chalice, so required someone who no longer had a career to risk (the previous PM, Gabriel Attal, was 35).
Barnier is known for having voted against the legalisation of male homosexuality in 1981, and having been the European Union鈥檚 top negotiator over Brexit. He was also minister of Agriculture and Foreign Secretary in the time of conservative president Nicolas Sarkozy. His 2021 proposal for draconian racist immigration control surprised those who had thought of him as a moderate. He comes from Les R茅publicains, which got 6.6% of the votes in the first round of the June elections and has 50 MPs in the National Assembly (the NFP has 160).
Sophie Binet, leader of the influential trade union confederation, the General Confederation of Labour (CGT), said that Barnier鈥檚 appointment showed 鈥渃ontempt for the choice of the voters鈥. Thomas Portes, a France Insoumise (France in Revolt, FI) MP and railway worker, well-known for his involvement in the Palestine solidarity movement, said: 鈥渢he political compass of Michel Barnier is his hatred of the people鈥. Barnier seemed to confirm his elitism today claiming he would take into account 鈥渢he people below鈥.
Barnier was not Macron's first choice by a long way. If the NFP had split and a social-liberal Socialist Party (PS) PM had got enough support from the right to manage to survive, this would have been easier for Macron. But the divided PS leadership narrowly voted last week against accepting a government led by Bernard Cazeneuve, who had left the party two years ago but remained within its traditions.
Without an immediate prospect of splitting the NFP, Macron has gone for an openly right-wing character. Barnier immediately announced his priorities were law and order and cutting immigration. He also said there would be 鈥渃hanges and breaks鈥 but he did not specify whether they would be to the left or the far right.
The appointment opens up a new phase in the deep political crisis here, but this is far from the last one. Barnier will have tremendous difficulty getting a majority in parliament for any legislation, and may rapidly lose a vote of confidence once parliament reassembles on October 3.
The media are presenting him as having 鈥渢he politics of consensus鈥. In fact, he will be hoping that the votes of the 140 or so far-right MPs will help him survive, so he is bound to be brandishing fantasies about French identity being under threat from immigration etc.
This may well not work: far-right politician Marine Le Pen is not ready to play junior partner to a discredited president; though for the moment she is declaring a 鈥渨ait and see鈥 attitude. All the components of the NFP have declared they will propose a motion of no confidence as soon as parliament reassembles.
Departing Macronite PM, Attal, commented: 鈥淔rench politics is sick, but there is a cure, providing we move away from sectarianism.鈥 By 鈥渟ectarianism鈥 he means wanting real change, higher wages, taxes for the wealthy and fighting racism and Islamophobia.
The resistance is getting organized. FI and a series of youth organisations have called more than 150 demonstrations across the country to defend democracy on September 7. After Barnier鈥檚 appointment, the Green Party has also called to join these demonstrations, although the PS has refused to join the mobilisation.
It is impossible to characterise the politics and priorities of the NFP without looking at the parties that make it up, which have in no way merged. The FI is the most radical, dynamic and determined of the four parties in the NFP. It has launched a campaign to have Macron impeached because he has not respected the results of the elections. The Communist Party, PS and the Greens are not supporting this.
The French constitution forbids repeat parliamentary elections before next June, so this will be a long crisis. Encouraged by the massive vote in June for the NFP program 鈥 which includes reversing attacks on pensions and unemployment benefits, papers for undocumented migrant workers, and wage rises for low paid workers 鈥 trade union leaders are announcing days of action in early October. To force the implementation of the dozens of excellent reforms in the NFP program, workers鈥 resistance will have to go far beyond what the national union leaders have in mind.
There is no need to artificially oppose electoral and parliamentary activity to resistance in the streets and workplaces. Of course, in the final analysis, the latter is more crucial. But it is because of the electoral alliance and the massive people鈥檚 campaign against voting for Le Pen that we do not have a fascist government in France today. And parliamentary activity can matter. The success of the parliamentary left in keeping fascists off the House Affairs committee has its importance. The left-dominated House Affairs committee will not be suspending MPs for displaying Palestinian flags in the assembly, as was the case last year. The fewer fascists in institutional positions the better.
If Macron gets away with ignoring the election results without a mass fight back, Le Pen will be much reinforced in her struggle to replace democracy with something much more sinister. Anticapitalists must vigorously defend the very limited democracy parliament gives us. We must demand a left government since the left came out first in the elections. And the campaign to impeach Macron because of his contempt for democratic procedures must be supported.
[John Mullen is a Marxist and an activist with the France Insoumise in the Paris region. His website is randombolshevik.org.]