
Activists have called for an independent inquiry into the Maules Creek coalmine in north-west NSW and its impact on the surrounding farming community after documents obtained by Environmental Justice Australia (EJA) revealed a litany of environmental licence breaches over the past six years.
EJA applied to access documents known as annual returns, which detail breaches or "non-compliance with [environmental] licence", through the Government Information (Public Access) Act. But Whitehaven Coal, which owns the Maules Creek mine, fought them all the way.
EJA's told the ABC: "I was gobsmacked at just how difficult it was to access these reports.
"All we wanted were the pollution reports that the company lodges with the [Environment Protection Authority] each year. These are things that should be in the public realm.
"The fact is it took us nine months of persistence 鈥 appeals and counter appeals 鈥 as Whitehaven stymied us at every turn.鈥
The breaches related to a , including dust and noise levels and pollution of waterways. The company was fined for the most serious breaches.
"Some of the infringements were minor in nature,鈥 Whelan said, 鈥渂ut other infringements were very significant.
"This is a company that has a wide range of penalties and infringements and we believe the penalties have been woefully inadequate to send the kind of signal that would bring the company into line."
For example, in December 2013, the company mined 138,095 tonnes of coal more than its licence allowed and was fined $15,000 鈥 an amount far below the value of the coal itself.
Lock the Gate Alliance National Coordinator Phil Laird, a landholder at Maules Creek, said: 鈥淚t鈥檚 obvious that the Maules Creek mine should never have been approved. It鈥檚 been a diabolical neighbour and has torn my community apart as surely as it has torn the Leard Forest and the landscape.
鈥淲hitehaven Coal 鈥 has broken its commitments to the Maules Creek community about noise, air pollution and biodiversity, but compliance action by the state government so far has been underwhelming.
鈥淢eanwhile, this rogue company is trying to get approval for another damaging coal mine, at nearby Vickery. They shouldn鈥檛 even be considered for any further projects until they are 100% compliant at Maules Creek.
鈥淭丑别 showing that there are several actions Whitehaven could and should be taking to reduce dust. They鈥檝e been found to be non-compliant three years in a row and have had two penalty notices already this year, but they still haven鈥檛 cleaned up their act. It鈥檚 time for an independent inquiry.
鈥淩ural communities are being failed by a planning system that lets mining companies get away with ruining health, amenity and landscape and getting off scot free.
鈥淢aules Creek must be made an example of. We call on the planning minister and his Department to show that they take this seriously by launching a full inquiry and stopping this rogue operator.鈥
Like the article?聽Subscribe聽to 麻豆传媒 now! You can also聽聽us on Facebook and聽聽on Twitter.