The so-called China threat was discussed at a webinar on November 30 of around 150 people.
Organised by Australians for War Powers Reform (AWPR), it was addressed by Hugh White, emeritus professor of strategic studies at the Australian National University and Michael Sainsbury, a freelance journalist based in south east Asia. Broadcaster Quentin Dempster was the chair.
White said the danger of a war with China was real as 鈥淭aiwan has become the flashpoint in the growing rivalry between the United States and China鈥.
He said Australia 鈥渟hould definitely not go to war with China in support of the US鈥. It would 鈥渘ot be like previous US wars in Asia 鈥 it would almost certainly become World War III.鈥
The danger of a devastating nuclear war would be very real, White said.
China has recently built its nuclear arsenal up to more than 300, in comparison to the US and Russia which own .
鈥淭he mainstream media has moved in the last few years from praising China as a great partner, to a return to the rhetoric of 鈥榊ellow Peril鈥,鈥 Sainsbury said. 鈥淓veryone has jumped on board the anti-China campaign.鈥
White said that the Australia Britain US military alliance (AUKUS) is a 鈥渉uge escalation鈥 and 鈥渁 mistake鈥 in government policy. The plan to acquire US nuclear-powered submarines, even though they will not be ready until around 2050, sends the US the message: 鈥淲e are with you, come what may鈥.
Australia鈥檚 hosting of the nuclear-capable B-52 bombers at Tindal base in the Northern Territory represents 鈥渁 combat operation鈥 White said. 鈥淎UKUS encourages the US to decide to go to war with China.鈥
Sainsbury said that AUKUS, stationing US marines and the upgrade of the Pine Gap spy base 鈥渟ends the wrong signal to the US, to China and to the countries of the South East Asian region鈥 and all without Australians being consulted. 鈥淎ustralia needs much greater liaison with Indonesia, Vietnam and other Asian countries,鈥 he said.
White said it was 鈥渦nfortunate鈥 that Labor is just as committed to the anti-China plan as the former Coalition government. 鈥淲e need a change in direction,鈥 he said.
Both speakers agreed that funds should not be spent on raising defence spending when 鈥渢here are a lot of things to spend money on, other than defence鈥.
An AWPR statement calling for constitutional changes to mandate federal parliament to vote before any Australian forces are sent to participate in overseas conflicts. Currently, the prime minister and executive make聽the decision.
[Visit for more information.]