�鶹��ý

Human Rights Watch issued a landmark report on April 27 concluding that Israel against the Palestinian people.

Israel has “pursued an intent to maintain the domination of Jewish Israelis over Palestinians throughout the territory it controls,” the group said.

The is one of the crimes against humanity in the Rome Statute, the founding treaty of the International Criminal Court — putting it in the same category as enslavement and extermination.

With its report, HRW joins growing calls for an approach based on rights and accountability, rather than the long dead “peace process” that has for decades provided an alibi for international inaction as Israel entrenches its colonial grip on the Palestinian people and their land.

But if anyone thinks this paradigm shift — even from such a mainstream organisation as HRW — will dent the European Union’s bedrock commitment to maintaining the brutally unjust status quo in Palestine, they will be sorely disappointed.

I wrote to the EU’s foreign policy spokesperson Peter Stano to ask for the bloc’s reaction to the HRW report.

I noted that it comes months after B’Tselem — an Israeli human rights group — at long last reached its own conclusion that .

The answer from Stano came to 160 words, and not a single one of them is “apartheid”.

“We are giving the report by Human Rights Watch due attention,” Stano asserted.

There then followed a lengthy recitation of the EU’s supposed commitment to human rights, international law and to “a negotiated two-state solution”.

In pursuit of this ever-receding mirage, Stano concluded that “the EU will engage with both Israel and the Palestinians, and with our international and regional partners to this end.”

That sounds suspiciously like the “” that US President Ronald Reagan and British Prime Minister advocated in the 1980s in an effort to stave off international pressure and sanctions on South Africa’s white supremacist apartheid regime.

As an exercise in using a torrent of words to say absolutely nothing of substance, Stano’s statement would make Sir Humphrey Appleby — the from the classic British comedy series Yes Minister and Yes Prime Minister — proud.

Unfortunately, however, this is not comedy, and the European Union’s stubborn refusal to hold Israel accountable costs Palestinian lives.

I put Stano’s response to Omar Shakir, the lead author of the and the group’s director for Israel and Palestine.

“We are looking forward to engaging with the EU and its member states on our findings and recommendations,” Shakir wrote rather diplomatically, noting that the EU has “repeatedly pledged its commitment to international human rights law and mechanisms”.

“We therefore strongly believe that the EU should as a starting point recognise the reality of apartheid and persecution on the ground, and engage the recommendations outlined in our report from that point of departure,” Shakir added.

Yet despite the growing recognition that Israel is an apartheid regime, the EU is doing the diplomatic equivalent of putting its fingers in its ears, closing its eyes and humming as loudly as it can in order to what is going on around it.

The EU the appointment of a new “special representative for the Middle East peace process”, on April 29, mandated “to provide an active contribution to the final settlement of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on a two-state solution”.

Sven Koopmans, a Dutch diplomat, will be replacing compatriot Susanna Terstal who in the same role has been with Israel lobby groups and publicly echoing anti-Palestinian talking points — while achieving nothing for “peace.”

Despite its relentless propaganda about how much it loves human rights, the EU stands — along with the United States — as the greatest enabler of Israeli apartheid, and thus an enemy of freedom, justice and equality for Palestinians.

[Abridged from .]