
Reporting Israelās war on Gaza has become the greatest credibility challenge for journalists and the media in our time.
The latest assassination of an Al Jazeera photojournalist, while documenting atrocities, has prompted a leading analyst to appeal to global journalists to ātake a standā to protect the profession.
°Õ³ó±šĢż, the 27-year-old eldest son of Al Jazeera Gaza bureau chief Wael Dahdouh, along with freelancer Mustafa Thuraya, has taken the death toll of Palestinian journalists to 109 (according to Al Jazeera sources, even while global media freedom watchdogs report slightly lower figures).
Emotional responses and a wave of condemnation have thrown the spotlight on the toll faced by reporters and their families.
Wael Dahdouh, 52,Ģż,Ģżin an earlier Israeli air raid that hit the house they were sheltering in. After mourning for several hours, Dahdouh senior was back on the job, documenting the war.
Just under 20 months ago, Al Jazeeraās best known correspondent,Ģż, was fatally shot by an Israeli sniper, while reporting on the Occupied West Bank on May 11, 2022 in what Paris-based Reporters Without Borders (RSF) condemned, saying this āsystematic Israeli impunity is outrageousā.
The New York-based Committee to Protect JournalistsĀ , saying it āmust be independently investigated, and those behind their deaths must be held accountableā.
But few journalists would accept that this is anything other than a targeted killing, as most deaths of Palestinian journalists in the latest Gaza war have been: there is aĀ Ā in an attempt to suppress the truth.
āNowhere safe in Gazaā
Al Jazeeraās Palestinian-Israeli political affairs analyst andĀ author , who was born in Nazareth, has no doubt.
Speaking on the 24-hour Qatari world news channel, with at leastĀ Ā in Gaza ā 70%Ā of whom were women and children ā he said: āNowhere is safe in Gaza and no journalists are safe ā¦ That tells us something.
āIt is understood they are war journalists. But still the fact that more than 100 journalists were killed within three months is breaking yet another record in terms of killing children. and destruction of hospitals and schools and the killing of United Nations staff.
āAnd now with 109 journalists killed, this definitely requires a certain stand on the part of our colleagues around the world. Not just in a higher-up institution.
āI am talking about journalists around the world ā those who came to cover the World Cup in Doha for labour rights, or whatever.
āThose who are shedding tears in the Ukraine, those who are trying to cover Xinjiang in China [persecution of the Uyghur people], those who are claiming there are genocides happening right, left and centre ā from China to Ukraine, to elsewhere.
āThe same journalists who see in plain sight what is happening in Gaza should ā regardless if we disagree on Israelās motives, or Israelās objectives in this war ā must agree that the protection of journalists and their families is indispensable for our profession. And for their profession,ā Bishara said.
āJournalists, and journalism associations and syndicates around the world, especially in those countries with influence on Israel, as in Europe, or the United States ā¦ need to take a stand on what is going on in Gaza.
āCannot go unansweredā
āThis cannot continue and go on unanswered. What about them?
āTheyāre going to be from various media outlets deploying journalists in war-stricken areas. They will have to call for the defence of journalists and their lives and their protection.
āThis cannot go on like this, unabated in Gaza,ā Bishara said asĀ Ā the fighting could go on for another year.
°Õ³ó±šĢż,Ģżfiled against Israel in the International Court of Justice seeking an interim injunction for a ceasefire and due for a hearing on January 11, could pose the best chance for an end to the war.
Bishara has partially blamed Western news networks for failing to report the war on Gaza accurately and fairly: it is a criticism he has made in the past, and his articles about Israel are insightful and damning.
His call for journalists to take a stand has been echoed in some quarters whereĀ .
It has opened divisions among media groups about fairness and balance that have become the most bitter since the climate change and COVID-19 pandemic debates, whenĀ Ā threatened to undermine science.
In November, more than 1500 journalists from scores of US media organisations signed anĀ Ā in Western mediaās coverage of āIsraeli atrocities against Palestiniansā.
Israel has blocked foreign press entry, heavily restricted telecommunications and bombed press offices. Some 50 media headquarters in Gaza have been hit in the past month.
Israeli forces explicitly warned newsrooms they ācannot guaranteeā the safety of their employees from airstrikes. Taken with a decades-long pattern of lethally targeting journalists, Israelās actions show wide-scale suppression of speech.
In Britain, eightĀ Ā in late November to Al Jazeera accusing the British broadcaster of bias in its coverage of Gaza.
A 2300-word letter claimed that the BBC had a ādouble standardā and was failing to tell the Israel-Palestine conflict accurately, āinvesting greater effort in humanising Israeli victims compared with Palestinians and omitting key historical context in coverageā.
In Australia, anotherĀ Ā and the Media Entertainment and Arts Association (MEAA) called for āintegrity, transparency and rigourā in the coverage of the war and joined the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), RSF and others condemning Israelās attacks on journalists and journalism.
Editors ofĀ The Sydney Morning Herald, The Age and the Nine NetworkĀ hit back by banning staff who had signed the letter.
According toĀ , a senior Nine staff journalist resigned and readers angrily cancelled their subscriptions over the ban.
°ä°ł¾±°ģ±š²āĢżlater exposed that many editors and journalists who had madeĀ Ā and it is keeping an inventory of these āinfluencedā media people: at least 77 so far.
The Daily Blogās editor Martyn Bradbury has alsoĀ /Ā have also been influenced by Israeli media massaging.
Bradbury wrote: āIf Israel has sunk that much time and resource charming Australian journalists and politicians, the question has to be asked, [has] the pro-Israel lobby sent NZ journalists and politicians on these junkets and if they have, who are they?ā
He wrote to the NZ Press Gallery, the ājournalist unionā, and media companies requesting a list of names.
Pacific journalists ought to be also added to the list.
I have just returned to NZ from a two-month trip in the Mediterranean, Red Sea and Australia.ĢżAfter a steady diet of comprehensive and well back-grounded reporting from global news channels such as TRT World News and Al Jazeera (which contrasted in quality, depth and fairness with Western coverage from the BBC and CNN), I was stunned by the blatant bias of much of the Australian news media, particularly News CorpāsĀ The AustralianĢż²¹²Ō»åĢżThe AdvertiserĀ in Adelaide.
Some examples of the bias, and my commentaries, can be seenĀ ,Ģż,Ģż,Ģż,ĢżĢż²¹²Ō»åĢż.
A pithy indictment of much of the Western reporting ā including in NZĀ ā can be read in theĀ .Ģż
Exposing much of the Israeli propaganda and fabricated claims since October 7 (and even from the time of The Nakba in 1948)Ā : āI am haunted by one other consideration. It is not just that Western commentators, columnists and chat show hosts often donāt know what they are talking about. Itās not even that they pretend they do.
āItās the comfort of their lives. They sit in warm, pleasant studios where they earn six-figure sums for their opinions. They take no risks and convey no truths.ā
A polar opposite from the Gaza carnage and the risks that courageous Palestinian journalists face daily to bear witness. They are an inspiration to the rest of us.
[Ā is editor and publisher of Asia Pacific Report and CafĆ© Pacific where this piece was first published.]