War propaganda justifies a bloody arms export dream

March 29, 2022
Issue 
Left: Defence Department propaganda about 'making things'. Right: Saudi-led air strikes on Yemen. Australia exports weapons to Saudi Arabia.

You have probably seen the slick new听听by the Department of Home Affairs urging you to anonymously report suspicious activity 鈥渁s our borders open up鈥. Soon you should notice another advertising campaign, this time from the Department of Defence (let鈥檚 call it what it is 鈥 the War Ministry) called听.

The aim of this advertising is to sell the Scott Morrison government鈥檚 campaign to make Australia the 10th-biggest arms exporter in the world (it is currently 20th).

The ad posits that for generations Australians have 鈥渕ade stuff鈥 in their backyards but now these skills are needed to supply 鈥渙ur growing defence industries鈥.

Even before the 2022 budget was delivered, the government was already promising the听听of the armed forces since the Vietnam War. Labor 鈥渙pposition鈥 leader Anthony Albanese has听听to deliver even more!

The ad campaigns for the bipartisan war drive might suck in some people, but you can be sure it is music to the ears of advertising companies and the arms industry.

The defence department refuses to say how much the campaign is costing the public, but investigative reporter Callum Foot听found that the agency behind the ad, , 鈥渞eceived almost half a billion dollars in government media contracts in 2021鈥 鈥 $70 million of which was from the defence department. Ker-ching!

Minister for Defence Industry Melissa Price boasted on March 14: 鈥淭he Morrison Government is investing an unprecedented $270 billion in Defence capabilities over the next 10 years.

鈥淭he level of Government investment in our defence industries has grown significantly and as a result the number of jobs created to support this growth is increasing at a rapid rate.鈥

Ker-ching! Ker-ching!

Australia is not yet in the top 10 arms exporters, but it already leads the pack in refusing to place restrictions on its arms exports to bloody tyrannical regimes, including Saudi Arabia, which has been waging war against Yemen. That war remains largely ignored internationally, even though the atrocities exceed those in Ukraine.

Canadian peace research group Project Ploughshares released a听 in October comparing the policies of Saudi Arabia鈥檚 military suppliers, which include the United States, Britain, France and Australia.

It found that four suppliers 鈥 Australia, France, Spain and Poland 鈥 did not place any restrictions on weapons transfers to Saudi Arabia.

The report also revealed that Saudi Arabia is the world鈥檚 single largest importer of weapon and is rapidly increasing imports. Aspiring world leaders in weapons exports like Australia hope to have an edge over their competitors by ignoring human rights and peace groups.

Michelle Fahy, Australian National University-based researcher, wrote in听that when then-Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull announced Australia鈥檚 arms export ambitions in 2018, he was warned by Andrew Feinstein, one of the world鈥檚 foremost experts on the arms trade, that Australia would 鈥済et your hands covered in blood if you want to be one of the big 10鈥. Now it has, Fahy wrote.

After the launch of Australia鈥檚 Defence Export Strategy in 2018, then-Minister for Defence Industry Christopher Pyne gave a commitment that Australia would only authorise military exports to countries 鈥渓ike ourself who support the rules-based international order鈥.

But as Fahy explained: 鈥淗e鈥檇 broken this commitment before he even made it. Or, to put it more plainly, he lied.鈥

Fahy noted that former Labor MP and international lawyer Melissa Parke, who is now one of the United Nations' group of experts on Yemen,听pointed out听that听鈥淎ustralia鈥檚 actions in approving arms exports to countries that are known to be committing serious violations of human rights, and its failure to be transparent about this, are inconsistent with its obligations under international law鈥.

鈥淗aving signed up to 鈥 these international laws, the Australian government can鈥檛 just cherry pick what aspects it鈥檚 going to abide by, especially when it 鈥 lectures other countries, such as China and Russia, about the importance of the international rule of law.鈥

Shamefully, it does.

If you are repulsed by the hypocritical war-mongering politicians and the armaments industry whose profits they are fattening, then you should join the movement for change by becoming a听and making a听听to our $200,000 Fighting Fund.

You need 麻豆传媒, and we need you!

麻豆传媒 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.