United States: Behind Baltimore鈥檚 bridge disaster

April 17, 2024
Issue 
damage from a container ship collision with a bridge
Damage resulting from the collision and collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore. Photo: US Army Corps of Engineers (nab.usace.army.mil)

The Francis Scott Key Bridge in Baltimore, Maryland, collapsed after it was hit by a massive container ship on March 26, killing six maintenance workers.

The ship lost all power just before the collision and, according to Work-Bites, was leaving the port .

Eight workers 鈥 鈥 were repairing potholes on the bridge at the time. The men who died had migrated to the US from Mexico, Honduras, Guatemala and El Salvador.

The Dali issued a May Day call moments before colliding with one of the bridge鈥檚 supports at 8 knots (15km/h). The entire bridge span collapsed within seconds.

Divers recovered the bodies of two workers, inside a submerged pick-up truck. The other four are presumed dead. They were working in the middle of the span when it collapsed.

The ship underwent 鈥渞outine engine maintenance鈥 in the port before it lost power, reported the Associated Press.

鈥淎n inspection of the Dali last June at a port in Chile identified a problem with the ship鈥檚 鈥榩ropulsion and auxiliary machinery鈥, according to Equasis, a shipping information system鈥, however a US Coast Guard inspection in New York in September 鈥渄idn鈥檛 identify any deficiencies, according to the Equasis data鈥.

Federal inspectors rated the in fair condition last June, reported the AP. 鈥淏ut the structure did not appear to have pier protection to withstand the crash鈥, according to experts.

Federal and state investigators said the crash an accident, despite some media and politicians raising the possibility of terrorism early on.

Corporate greed

It will take months to fully reopen the port. Baltimore is the ninth busiest port in the country. More than 50 shipping companies 鈥 including cruise ship lines 鈥 do business with the port and 1800 vessels visit the port each year. Jobs and millions of dollars are being lost.

How could this disaster happen?

Had the Dali had lost power in the open sea, or had enough skilled personnel 鈥 even under manual control 鈥 things could have turned out differently.

The collision certainly indicates that more precautions should have been taken by an industry known for .

In the US, unique maritime laws limit shipping companies鈥 liability, which allows insurance companies to legally avoid massive payouts when sued.

The 顿补濒颈鈥檚 owner, Grace Ocean Private Ltd and its manager, Synergy Marine Pty Ltd 鈥 both based in Singapore 鈥 have jointly filed a court petition to limit their legal liability from the collision to about $43.6 million, based on the value of the vessel鈥檚 remains.

Maryland鈥檚 federal court will ultimately decide who is at fault and how much they are liable for.

According to the American Society of Civil Engineers鈥 2021 of the more than 617,000 bridges across the country, 42% are at least 50 years old and 46,154 (7.5%) are considered structurally deficient.

A 2023 American Road and Transportation Building Association report said that one in three bridges across the country need repair or replacement.

Most bridges were built around the world prior to the 1980s. And recent ones cannot manage a collision with modern container ships.

As reported by the New York Times, the Dali was almost 300 metres long by 48 metres wide. In the 1970s, the average container ships were about 215m x 20m.

However, 鈥湺俨贡艟扁檚 size was not necessarily a factor in the accident,鈥 wrote the NYT, 鈥渁nd investigations continue鈥 into the cause of the collision.

Safety concerns

Roland 鈥淩ex鈥 Rexha, secretary-treasurer of the Marine Engineers鈥 Beneficial Association told the Dali disaster 鈥渉ighlights the downside of not having ships escorted by tug boats until they are out on the open sea away from critical infrastructure鈥 and 鈥渢he risks created with building larger and larger vessels while using automation as justification for reducing crew size鈥. He also pointed to 鈥渢he wide variance between US maritime safety standards and the rest of the world鈥.

Rexha added that changes of policy meant decisions about whether or not to have a tug boat assist when vessels go under a bridge are now in the hands of the individual port and 鈥渨hat they deem is the safest way to operate鈥.

鈥淚 think in all ports there鈥檚 going to be a revisiting of how we operate and what鈥檚 the safest way to move vessels out into safe water.鈥

As cargo ships have gotten bigger and technology advanced, Rexha pointed out, companies have moved to so-called 鈥渕inimum crewing鈥, effectively halving the number of officers in each department on a vessel.

鈥淎t that point, everything becomes more difficult when there is an issue, which is most likely going to happen when you are trying to maneuver the ship. That鈥檚 the most dangerous part of any transit for any ship. That鈥檚 when there鈥檚 the potential hazard [and] 鈥 the potential for a real tragedy.鈥

It is possible to regain control of a ship that has lost power through switching to manual control. But to do so, explained Rexha, you need sufficient crew strength.

鈥淏ut you can鈥檛 do that with just two people, especially if you are running around to try and get the lights back on.鈥

Regarding the fate of the maintenance workers, Donna Edwards, president of the Maryland State & DC AFL-CIO, told Work-Bites: 鈥淭hey shut down the bridge so that some people did not get on who would have died in the collapse. What warning did the workers get? It鈥檚 opened all of our eyes to how quickly this can happen. In a manner of seconds that whole bridge came down.鈥

Patrick Moran, president of Maryland public sector union AFSCME Council 3 said the tragedy has prompted questions about maritime and construction sector occupational safety.

鈥淰ery little of the state work [like the bridge paving] that鈥檚 contracted out is union 鈥 it鈥檚 been a problem for the last decade or more.鈥

George Escobar chief of programs with Casa, a national non-profit that advocates for migrant rights told MSNBC that migrant workers are at the forefront of keeping the country going, while being 鈥渄isproportionately impacted鈥 by failed investment in infrastructure, healthcare and housing.

One thing is clear: ship disasters and bridge collapses will happen again so long as the profit motive drives corporate and government policy makers.

You need 麻豆传媒, and we need you!

麻豆传媒 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.