Patriarchy in Parliament

June 16, 2023
Issue 
Brittany Higgins has faced stomach churning attacks from the corporate media
Brittany Higgins is yet to receive any justice over her allegation that fellow staffer Bruce Lehrmann raped her. Image: Ā鶹“«Ć½

The spectacle of Coalition MPs weaponising Brittany Higginsā€™ allegation of rape in Parliament House in 2019 because they thought they had a ā€œscalpā€ (Minister for Women Katy Gallagher) was stomach churning.

However, more disturbing is the rude reminder about how entrenched sexism is ā€” including in parliament, the so-called "peopleā€™s house".

Coalition MPsā€™ attack campaign on Gallagher over who knew what, when and what they did about it, came to a sudden halt mid-week after Senator Lidia Thorpe outed their hypocrisy, including alleging that she was sexually harassed by Coalition Senator David Van.

Van has been expelled from the Coalition party room. Other Coalition MPs confirmed his sexist pattern of behavior, which forced Liberal leader Peter Duttonā€™s hand.

Van denies he assaulted anyone, although he admits to apologising to a colleague for repeatedly touching her when she had asked him not to.

The Australian Human Rights Commissionā€™s includes more than ā€œsexually explicit physical contactā€ and ā€œsexually explicit emails or SMS text messagesā€: it also includes ā€œunwelcome touchingā€, ā€œstaring or leeringā€ and making ā€œsuggestive comments or jokesā€.

These patterns of behaviour are so much a reality for so many women that even well-meaning people still say things such as: ā€œBut, she didnā€™t get my jokeā€; or ā€œShe took it out of contextā€; or ā€œShe never used to be like thatā€.

These attitudes reflect how entrenched sexism is: assaults are passed off as ā€œmisunderstandingsā€ ā€” on the womenā€™s part, no less.

Sexual harassment, including assault, is so commonplace that women find it hard to report it, fearing they will not be believed or that they should ā€œsuck it upā€.

After Higginsā€™ allegations about being raped in a parliamentary office, then-PM Scott Morrison initiated several inquiries: the into how serious incidents are handled at Parliament House; Phil Gaetjensā€™ report of who knew what and when about the alleged rape; into the behaviour of the PMā€™s media staff; the Celia Hammond review of how Coalition offices operate; and into parliamentā€™s workplace culture.

Sex Discrimination commissioner Jenkinsā€™ inquiry on behalf of the federal government was tabled on November 2021. It made 55 recommendations; a year later Morrison announced he would ā€œacceptā€ them.

Angela Priestly from Womenā€™s Agenda wrote in 2021 that the ā€, offering ā€œsolid regulatory framework and better support for survivorsā€. She said their ā€œadoptionā€ will mean sexual harassment is included in the definition of ā€œserious misconduct across all workplaces ā€” and therefore a valid reason for dismissalā€.

She said they ā€œwould require significant Commonwealth funding if they are to be adoptedā€ ā€” a lot more than ā€œthe pathetic $2.1 million provided in the 2020 Budget to ā€˜help prevent sexual harassment in Australian workplacesā€™ā€.

But ā€œacceptingā€ or ā€œadoptingā€ recommendations are two very different things. Enforcing them is another.

figures from January last year show that one-in-three people experienced harassment at work (and we should assume thatā€™s at the low end). It said workplace sexual harassment can cause ā€œboth psychological and physical harmā€, but it can also affect others.

ā€œSexual harassment can take many forms. It can be overt, covert or subtle. It can be repeated or a one-off incident. Sexual harassment can cause harm to the person it is directed at, as well as anyone who witnesses the behaviour.ā€Ā 

It said the person in charge of the business (or party) has ā€œa positive duty ā€¦ to do all that you reasonably can to eliminate or minimise the risk of sexual harassment at work.ā€

In many workplaces, including parliament as weā€™ve heard over the past week, this duty is not being taken seriously.

Thorpeā€™s anger at Vanā€™s hypocritical attacks on Gallagher prompted her to use parliamentary privilege to call him out. She was forced to retract her words, but not the message. Unfortunately, Thorpe was not taken seriously until Liberal Senator Amanda Stoker also made allegations against Van ā€” confirming a pattern of behaviour.

Higgins, meanwhile, is yet to receive any justice over her allegation that fellow staffer Bruce Lehrmann raped her.

The weaponisation of this case has not changed workplace culture, as someĀ . It has underscored just how far we are from having safe workplaces where respect at work is more than a slogan.

You need Ā鶹“«Ć½, and we need you!

Ā鶹“«Ć½ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.