Nuclear submarines may never appear, but AUKUS is already in place

March 18, 2024
Issue 
An upgraded HMAS Stirling in WA will cater for one British and up to four US nuclear-powered submarines rotating through in what is known as Submarine Rotational Force-West. Photo: HMAS Stirling in WA/Australian Government Submarine Agency

One year since Prime Minister to unveil the聽 the news came that聽聽Virginia class nuclear-powered submarines supposed to arrive in 2032 may not happen.

聽announced AUKUS in September 2021 and Albanese continued to champion the pact between the US, Britain and Australia.

Phase one involves Australia acquiring eight nuclear-powered submarines as tensions in the Indo-Pacific are growing.

Concerns about the submarines ever materialising are not new, despite the US passing its聽 2024 which facilitates the transfer of the nuclear powered war ships.

However, the Pentagon鈥檚 2025 fiscal year budget only set aside funding to build one Virginia submarine. This affects the聽聽deal as the US had promised to lift production from聽聽to meet all requirements.

Australia鈥檚 acquisition of the first of three second-hand SSNs were to bridge the submarine gap, as talk about a US-led war on China continues.

US Democratic congressperson Joe Courtney told the Sydney Morning Herald on March 12 the US is聽, meaning promises to Australia are being deprioritised.

Courtney said that the downturn in production 鈥渨ill remove one more attack submarine from a fleet that is already 17 submarines below the navy鈥檚 long-stated requirement of 66鈥.

The US needs to produce 18 more submarines by 2032 to be able to pass聽one on to Australia.

After passing laws permitting the transfer of nuclear technology, the deal is running a year at least behind schedule.

Greens Senator David Shoebridge said on X that 鈥淲hen the US passed the law to set up AUKUS they put in kill switches, one of which聽allowed the 聽if doing so would 鈥榙egrade the US undersea capabilities鈥欌.

Pat Conroy, Labor鈥檚 defence industry minister, retorted the government is confident the submarines will appear.

The White House seems unfazed; it would have been aware of the problems for some time.

Meanwhile the USS Annapolis, a US nuclear-powered submarine (SSN) has docked in Boorloo/Perth.

Regardless of whether Australia acquires any nuclear-powered vessels, the rest of the AUKUS deal, including interoperability with the US, is already underway.

Andrew Hastie, Liberal Party spokesperson, confirmed that construction at HMAS Stirling聽聽next year for 鈥 (SRF-West)鈥, the permanent US-British nuclear-powered submarine base in WA, which is due to be completed in 2027.

SRF-West includes 700 US army personnel and their families being stationed in WA. If the second-hand nuclear submarines do not materialise, the US submarines will be on hand.

SRF-West may also serve as an alternative to the five British-designed AUKUS SSNs, slated to be built in Kaurna Yerta/Adelaide over coming decades.

Australia respects the Pentagon鈥檚 warhead ambiguity policy, meaning that any US military equipment stationed here could be carrying nuclear weapons: we will never know.

Shoebridge said on March 13 he was entering a hearing to decide where the AUKUS powers聽. Local waste dumps are being considered,聽聽and Britain do not have permanent radioactive waste dumps.

The waste to be dumped is said to have a low-level radioactivity. However, as former Senator Rex Patrick pointed out, SSNs聽聽at the end of their shelf lives that will need to be stored somewhere, underground, forever.

罢丑别听, tabled last November, allows for the AUKUS SSNs to be constructed and also provides for 鈥溾.

The Australian public is spending 聽on helping the US submarine industrial base expand capacity. An initial US$2 billion will be spent next year, followed by $100 million annually from 2026 through to 2033.

The Pentagon has聽US$4 billion for its submarine industry next year, with an extra US$11 billion over the following five years.

The removal of the Virginia subs, and even the AUKUS submarines from the agreement, would be in keeping with the terms of the聽, signed off by then PM Tony Abbott.

As part of the Barack Obama administration鈥檚 2011 鈥減ivot to Asia鈥, the US-Australia Force Posture Agreement allows for 2500 Marines to be stationed in the Northern Territory.

It sets up increasing interoperability between both countries鈥 air forces and allows the US unimpeded access to dozens of 鈥渁greed-to facilities and areas鈥.

These agreed bases remain classified.

However, as the in the NT reveals, when the US decides to do that it takes full control.

Tindall has been upgraded to allow for six US B-52 bombers that may be carrying nuclear warheads.

US laws that facilitate the transfer of Virginia-class submarines also make clear that as Australia is now classified a US domestic military source this allows the US privileged access to critical minerals, such as lithium.

[Paul Gregoire writes for where a version of this article was first published.]

You need 麻豆传媒, and we need you!

麻豆传媒 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.