NSW unions campaign against anti-strike and anti-protest laws

October 4, 2022
Issue 
Nurses taking strike action in Sydney in February around safe nurse-to-patient ratios. Photo: Isaac Nellist

The New South Wales Coalition government鈥檚 bill imposing big fines on unions taking industrial action is being held up in the Legislative Council because Labor, the Greens and a number of cross-benchers oppose it.

The government has launched an industrial war on public sector workers campaigning for pay rises that match inflation.

Finance minister Damien Tudehope announced in June he was going to fine unions $55,000 for taking strike action without Industrial Relations Commission (IRC) approval. Fines of up to $27,500 would be levied for each strike day with up to $110,000 levied on unions that repeatedly breach IRC orders.

for the first day of industrial action outside IRC authorisation and $5000 a day after that.

Unions NSW secretary Mark Morey described the bill as 鈥渟ome of the most anti-democratic legislation I鈥檝e ever seen鈥. He told The Guardian on June 23 that 鈥渋t鈥檚 completely bloody-minded鈥.

Unions NSW has launched a community campaign against the new anti-strike law, including sending more than 11,000 emails to crossbench MPs and crowd-funding an advertising campaign to inform the public. Around 15,000 people have publicly opposed the bill.

The union movement also opposes the government鈥檚 draconian anti-protest laws 鈥 the Roads and Crimes Legislation Amendment Bill 2022 鈥 which was rushed through parliament in April with the Labor opposition聽supporting it.

The law aimed to stop climate protesters taking non-violent direct action in Sydney and Newcastle. It imposes fines of up to $22,000 and/or up to two years in jail on those who protest on select roads, bridges and near railway stations.

This law aims to bankrupt citizens who take action over the climate crisis or other important social and economic concerns.

Maritime Union of Australia (MUA) Sydney branch secretary Paul Keating criticised Labor鈥檚 support for the anti-protest laws.

Keating told Paul Gregoire from : 鈥淎ny type of fines on workers and unions regarding strike action, for defending their right to work or for better wages and conditions are repressive. And they should be abolished.鈥

He said that governments had 鈥渉yper-regulated鈥 unions over the last three decades, including with 鈥渟ignificant fines attached to any form of industrial action鈥.

NSW laws have prevented public sector unions, including teachers, nurses, transport and maritime workers to seek a wage rise over 2.5%, he said.

We know with public sector wage rises there will be a 鈥渇low-on effect鈥 into the private sector and 鈥渨orkers benefit from that鈥.

He said Labor was correct to oppose the fines on trade unions but that 鈥渢hey should be ashamed鈥 of聽鈥減roviding free passage to the anti-protest laws鈥.

He said Labor supported these laws, using the excuse of not supporting a fringe group even though they were 鈥渁cting in a non-violent way鈥.

鈥淭heir actions were [about] civil disobedience. And, we know that the anti-protest laws are far more reaching.鈥

Keating said the MUA believes the anti-protest laws are 鈥渢here to repress and oppress the rights of workers, trade unions and our communities鈥 and that 鈥淟abor is on the wrong side of the working class, our communities and the trade union movement [on this issue]鈥.

[Support Unions NSW鈥檚 鈥淧roud to Protest鈥 campaign .]

You need 麻豆传媒, and we need you!

麻豆传媒 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.