The European Court of Human Rights struck a major blow to Israel鈥檚 efforts to silence its critics on June 11, when it overturned the criminal convictions against 11 Palestinian rights activists in France.
The court that the convictions against the activists for calling on shoppers to boycott Israeli goods violated the European Convention on Human Rights鈥 guarantee of freedom of expression.
The court has ordered the French government to pay each of the activists about US$8000 in damages and awarded them their legal costs.
The ruling is a significant boost to the boycott, divestment and sanctions movement that aims to pressure Israel to end its crimes against Palestinians and its violations of international law.
鈥淭his momentous court ruling is a decisive victory for freedom of expression, for human rights defenders and for the BDS movement for Palestinian freedom, justice and equality,鈥 Rita Ahmad on behalf of the Palestinian Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions National Committee (BNC).
The judgment will have major implications for state repression of the BDS movement across Europe, especially in where 鈥渁dvocates for Palestinian rights face fierce restrictions on their civil rights,鈥 the BNC added.
Israel and its lobby have in recent years encouraged governments around the world to pass laws and policies aimed at silencing supporters of Palestinian rights.
Amnesty International also .
鈥淭oday鈥檚 landmark decision sets a significant precedent that should stop the misuse of anti-discrimination laws to target activists campaigning against human rights violations perpetrated by Israel against Palestinians,鈥 Marco Perolini, a researcher for the human rights group in France, said.
The ruling comes at a time when Israel is charging ahead with plans to annex large parts of the occupied West Bank, no doubt encouraged by the of the European Union and its member states to take any meaningful action to stop it.
State prosecution
The was brought to the European Court of Human Rights by the activists who are members of Collectif Palestine 68, a local group that supports the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign.
In September, 2009 and May, 2010, the activists took part in actions at a Carrefour supermarket in Illzach, a town in northeastern France.
They wore T-shirts saying 鈥淧alestine will live鈥 and 鈥淏oycott Israel鈥. They shouted slogans and passed out leaflets urging shoppers not to buy Israeli goods, in order to pressure Israel to stop violating Palestinian rights.
They asked shoppers to sign a petition urging the supermarket chain to stop stocking Israeli goods. They were entirely peaceful actions.
Following the May 2010 action, a public prosecutor charged the activists with inciting discrimination, hatred and violence against a group of people because of its origin, race, ethnicity or religion.
As evidence, the charge sheet specifically cited their campaign slogans, including that 鈥渂uying Israeli products legitimises crimes in Gaza鈥.
The supermarket chain itself filed no legal complaint against the activists.
It was entirely a state prosecution, following the instruction of France鈥檚 justice minister who, in 2010, to go after BDS activists.
In December 2011, the criminal court in the city of Mulhouse .
The trial court rejected charges that the activists intended to incite hatred or discrimination by calling on consumers not to buy Israeli goods.
But in November 2013, an appeals court convicted the activists. It sentenced them to pay fines and costs totalling tens of thousands of dollars.
In October 2015, the Court of Cassation, France鈥檚 highest tribunal for criminal appeals, in a ruling that was widely viewed as a severe setback for freedom of speech.
Protected speech
In its June 11 ruling, the European Court of Human Rights affirmed that 鈥渢he actions and remarks imputed to the applicants had concerned a subject of public interest鈥 and 鈥渢hose actions and words had fallen within the ambit of political or militant expression鈥.
It added that 鈥渋t was in the nature of political speech to be controversial and often virulent鈥.
The ruling faults the French courts for failing to respect Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights 鈥 the guarantee of freedom of expression 鈥 and failing to conduct 鈥渁n appropriate assessment of the facts鈥.
The campaign group BDS France the court victory and vowed to 鈥渃ontinue boycott actions of Israeli products and multinational companies that are complicit in Israeli apartheid鈥.
鈥淲e also call for the boycott of complicit Israeli universities and institutions, as well as of cultural and sporting events that promote Israeli apartheid,鈥 the group added.
鈥淚srael, an apartheid country, cannot forever prevent the triumph of justice and freedom for the Palestinian people.鈥
[Reprinted from .]