Comment by Rob McKinnon-Lower
Chemicals don't procreate, living things do. So they are obviously inherently different — more organised, hence the term "organism". In the 1850s the laws which govern organic matter were unknown, and one of the areas of study for science concerned fermentation: was it a chemical or an organic process?
Antoine Bechamp, a biologist and physician, discovered that ferments were organic. In fact he discovered the living molecules, microzymas, which were essential to ferments and a necessary ingredient of all living things. This was actually the discovery of genetics.
Why are Bechamp's discoveries of concern today? Because modern biology has ignored his discoveries and followed other, contrary, theories. This is why modern science cannot qualitatively differentiate between living matter and chemical matter — it sees one as a simple progression from the other. Bechamp discovered something fundamentally different.
He first discovered that the microzymas are living molecules and the originators of all life forms; that the addition of microzymas to a suitable chemical medium is absolutely necessary to, and the quintessence of, life. He found that microzymas are dormant or active in the earth, the atmosphere and in water, and of course they occurred in massive quantities in all animals and vegetables.
He found that the chemical or organic medium ("the soil") into which a microzyma was introduced is one of the factors (the other being the constitution) which determines its organic development — healthy or pathological. Being a physician, Bechamp also made several important medical discoveries while treating the sick. He discovered that many supposedly infectious bacteria (e.g. in tetanus) were actually internally generated pathological microzymian developments rather than infectious.
All these discoveries were brought to light by Ethel Hume in her book Pasteur Exposed. One of the reasons for her work being ignored must undoubtedly be that she was a woman disagreeing with the (male) scientific community in the 1930s and '40s.
Essentially, Bechamp discovered that disease germs were produced by the organism and thrown into the outer environment — not vice versa. Healthy organisms were the natural result of microzymian development in an unpolluted/natural environment while disease germs arose in a polluted environment.
This is directly opposed to Pasteur's belief that the germs in the air cause diseases, and worse still that polluting the organism (via immunisation) was the key to health protection. Indeed, Bechamp demonstrated that the practice of inoculation, even with healthy organisms, was inimical. not beneficial; immunisation specially injects diseased organisms.
A study of Bechamp's research shows that he was undoubtedly one of the greatest medical geniuses of the last century, while a study of Pasteur's work exposes him as an incompetent charlatan. Every discovery made by Bechamp was plagiarised and perverted by Pasteur.
Professor Geison of Princeton University recently published an article in New Scientist, and was reported in the West Australian of March 6, 1993, to be writing a history of Pasteur's frauds. Several others have already been written. Pasteur claimed that all life comes from "germs of the air", to which he gave his own name, microbes, to hide his plagiarism, totally ignoring the proven factor of "the soil"; later still, this specious plagiarism was even further perverted into: "specific germs of the air were the origins of specific diseases". (Pasteur Exposed.)
Confirmation of Bechamp's theories abound in orthodox medical literature as well as in advanced research outside the orthodox field. For instance, volumes have been recorded by orthodox medical doctors on the damage resulting from immunisation (e.g. Dr Compton Burnett, Vaccinosis). We have been fooled into believing that because most people survive, it is a safe and beneficial practice.
A scientific analysis must compare the health of vaccinated and unvaccinated people in a consistent manner. The authorities continually make statistical comparisons without keeping other factors constant or adopt Pasteur's unscientific (ab)use of animals. Today comparisons cannot be made ad hoc because vaccines are universally promoted, but in the past statistical comparisons and "vaccine trials" were conducted and the results were unequivocal. This is why the greatest epidemiologist of the last century, Dr Creighton, was quoted in the Encyclopedia Britannica (9th ed. 1885) saying "The theory of vaccination is a grotesque superstition", and why current Australian medical researcher Dr G. Dettman calls immunisation "a scientific hoax".
In Mirage of Health, distinguished medical researcher Rene Dubos exposed the incongruity of the "proof" that vaccines eradicate popular diseases. He shows that all diseases have come and gone erratically over the ages, and if we choose an appropriate period we may prove any point we wish. His major point is that airborne germs are not the major factor in diseases, "infectious" or otherwise; his experiments suggest they are not a factor at all.
In Every Second Child by Dr Kalokerinos we learn that doctors commonly falsify test results to confirm the presence of bacteria which should be present, but are not; this confirms Bechamp — germs are a result of disease, not the cause. (Dr Kalokerinos has saved the lives of numberless Aboriginal children by protecting them from vaccine damage.)
Note also the inconsistency of the AIDS-HIV relationship. About 90% of people with HIV will never get AIDS; about 40% of people who die from AIDS never had HIV; the eradication of HIV in a patient doesn't prevent death. All these facts (which are common knowledge in medical circles) also tend to support Bechamp's theory that the "germ" is a product of disease — not the cause. Bechamp's research actually predicts that vaccinations will almost inevitably lead to new and terrible diseases. It is therefore of great concern that a growing number of medicos are linking vaccines to AIDS, MS, SIDS, cancer, leukaemia, chronic fatigue, herpes, syphilis. [See advertised public seminars with Dr Eva Snead, page 23.]
There is one very important point which should not be overlooked in any discussion of the "germ" versus the "soil" theory of disease: vaccine production is a multimillion dollar industry; pollution prevention is not.