Carloā€™s Corner: Who knew neo-fascism could be so weird?

February 4, 2017
Issue 
'I wake up each day expecting to see a headline like "Trump Nukes China After Chow Mein Take Away Arrives 10 Minutes Late".'

Condemning Donald Trumpā€™s cruel bigotry is easy ā€” well, OK, maybe not for the Australian government, but for actual human beings with functioning consciences.

Then again, our country is so screwed up, our governmentā€™s response to the rise of the most extreme racist authoritarian president in US history is to ask him if heā€™s still ok to take desperate asylum seekers we wonā€™t help, coz we are sick of the expense of torturing them in isolated hellholes.

In all the furore about thatĢżphone call between the Orange Freak preening about the White House and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, the fact that the key topic was a proposal for cruel and illegal human trafficking gets forgotten. Not that it wasnā€™t a stunning spectacle to see Turnbull come into contact with a bigger ego for the first time in his life. And at least the orangutan with a dumb hair piece didnā€™t just spontaneously threaten to invade us mid-call, like he with Mexico.

The rise of Trump is extremely disturbing and dangerous, but it is always important to look on the bright side. For instance, anyone who ever wanted to see a replay of Caligulaā€™s reign over the Roman Empire, only live-tweeted, is in for a real treat.

It is not just that the Trump administration is pushing measures of sheer evil, like or screaming ahead with fossil fuel projects to hasten an already developing eco-holocaust. Itā€™s that itā€™s all so unpredictably unstable.

You never know what will come next. I wake up each day expecting to see a headline like ā€œTrump Nukes China After Chow Mein Take Away Arrives 10 Minutes Lateā€.

I always knew a decaying capitalist system could slide into barbarism, but I never could have guessed neo-fascism would be this weird.

Then there is Trumpā€™s attempts to communicate. I made the mistake of actually reading the transcript of Trumpā€™s just after his inauguration and I will never be the same again. I think I suffered multiple strokes during the first paragraph.

A Trump speech makes a William Burroughs novel look coherent ā€” only without the excuse of truckloads of smack. A two-year-old learning to speak makes more sense. Trump starts sentences, then clearly forgets why. Much of what he says holds no logical connection to anything else.

For instance, , Trump told the reporter: ā€œWe have to stop people from just pouring into our country. We have no idea where theyā€™re from.ā€ Well in that case, you small-handed alleged child rapist, how on Earth do you know where to build the fucking wall?

Of course, we should be careful not to exaggerate. For instance, just because Trump has banned all entry to the US from seven largely Muslim nations, that doesnā€™t mean it is a ā€œMuslim banā€. It is merely a ban on Muslims from countries with which Trump has . The distinction is clear.

Some of the complaints against Trump can seem pretty petty. Like the claims German Chancellor AngelaĢżMerkel had to about the Geneva Conventions. I mean, the guy is leader of the free world for Godā€™s sake, he is far too busy to be reading up on international treaties on human rights from, like, last century! Heā€™s got a wall to build!

And some of his measures are clearly justified. Like when a former Norwegian prime minister found himself because he visited Iran in 2014. I surely cannot be the only one to have read that and shouted: ā€œFinally! A world leader willing to take action against the real threat to peace and stability in the world today ā€” retired Norwegian politicians!

ā€œFor too long these Norse bastards have lorded it over us, but no more! Not on The Donaldā€™s watch!ā€

The explosion of protests and resistance to Trump has been a badly needed source of hope. Some leftists, however, want to complain about the protesters hypocrisy ā€” where were they during Obama? Why aren't they protesting against thisĢżor that?

Leaving aside the protests that did occur during Obamaā€™s rule (or did I just dream Occupy Wall Street and Black Lives Matter?), it is a simple fact that it is impossible to have a rise in protests without that meaning people are protesting who previously didnā€™t.

Yes, the Democrats are hypocrites who commit war crimes and push racist policies. And no doubt they will seek to co-opt anti-Trump sentiment for their own ends.

But the alternative is to just sit passively and watch. Presumably the only point to complaining about anti-Trump protests is so you can have future conversations such as:

ā€œWhat did you do during the Trump regime daddy?ā€
ā€œI complained online about the hypocrisy of those opposing his agenda for their selective approach to protesting.ā€
ā€œDid it work?ā€
ā€œYeah it got a few likes.ā€

After Trump hung up on Turnbull and called the refugee deal ā€œdumbā€ on Twitter, it seems social media was filled with to Australians for their Commander in Chiefā€™s rudeness. They seemed to think Turnbull is actually respected down here, or that anyone with a conscience is ā€œoffendedā€ that Trump would spit on a deal that would never have been proposed in any decent society.

Well, donā€™t worry about it. Hereā€™s a deal: you get rid of your mega-rich pro-corporate racist bastard of a leader and weā€™ll see what we can do about getting rid of ours.

Like the article?ĢżSubscribeĢżto Ā鶹“«Ć½ now! You can alsoĢżĢżus on Facebook andĢżĢżon Twitter.

Ģż

You need Ā鶹“«Ć½, and we need you!

Ā鶹“«Ć½ is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.