After 4.5 years of Adani vs Pennings, court delays another month

March 3, 2025
Issue 
Protesting outside a Downer facility in NSW. Downer was Adani鈥檚 preferred operator. Photo: Colin Ryan/Facebook

Mining and infrastructure conglomerate Adani, now Bravus, has not, as yet, appealed the Supreme Court鈥檚 ruling of December 6, in which most of its key points against Galilee Blockade activist Ben Pennings were struck out.

Adani鈥檚 case against Pennings was initiated in August 2020. While weakened, it has not been withdrawn.

The if it wished to appeal and re-build its case against Pennings. The Supreme Court on February 17 granted an extension of one month for Adani鈥檚 barristers to resubmit the case.

Pennings told supporters last year that the judge described parts of Adani鈥檚 case as聽鈥渃onfused, deficient and embarrassing鈥. 聽

The climate campaign against Adani began in 2010, when it lodged its first application for a mega coal mine project in the Galilee basin in Queensland, as well as a rail link and port development.

The Stop Adani campaign grew and had significant success. Millions of people learned about the impact of fossil fuel on climate change, and many became involved in the campaign.

A much-reduced mine was given the go-ahead in 2014 as financial backers dried up, and it has been operating since December 2021.

The focus of Galilee Blockade, for which Pennings was spokesperson, was to target potential contractors. This tactic had a significant impact on the almost seven-year gap between approval and the operation starting.

Downer, Adani鈥檚 鈥減referred contractor鈥 to build and operate the mine, pulled out of a conditional $2.6 billion contract in December 2017.

This was spun by Adani as a cost-cutting drive. But the context was the after then Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk鈥檚 partner was revealed to be working on Adani鈥檚 application to the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility with his employer, PricewaterhouseCoopers, acting for Adani.

The Galilee Blockade activist group had campaigned to get Downer to withdraw for a year, including with putting the case at its annual general meeting.聽

Adani鈥檚 civil suit against Pennings aims to intimidate activists and is consistent with its modus operandi in India.

Further delays in setting a court date will only add to the financial burden on Pennings, who has called on .

ben_pennings.jpg

Ben Pennings with climate activists. Photo supplied

You need 麻豆传媒, and we need you!

麻豆传媒 is funded by contributions from readers and supporters. Help us reach our funding target.

Make a One-off Donation or choose from one of our Monthly Donation options.

Become a supporter to get the digital edition for $5 per month or the print edition for $10 per month. One-time payment options are available.

You can also call 1800 634 206 to make a donation or to become a supporter. Thank you.